Regentide
regentide.net
Email me when this record changes
Following this record emails you when it gains a dated entry or its published claims are re-read, and nothing about any other supplier. No topic below is ticked: tick one only if you also want it in the same email.
1 recorded documentation gap also on file, subtracted from the score.
Compiled automatically from the dated observations in this vendor's record. How we evaluate.
Never merged into one number. Some supplier links here are referral links, marked where they appear, which pay Terminus Research when a reader buys. The same terms are open to every supplier in the ledger, apart from the one exception the referral policy page names, participation changes no score, rank, caution, or coverage decision, and a link is not an endorsement.
Regentide's retatrutide 10mg certificate names a lab whose A2LA accreditation is real and independently verifiable, Vanguard Laboratory, current through 2027, though the certificate prints that accreditation as #6377.01.01, a suffix A2LA's own record for 6377.01 does not carry. The certificate's own PDF content stream shows the addressee field originally reading "Triantex," with "Regentide" drawn over it as the last text object on the page, and all ten certificates the vendor's media library holds show the same pattern, rendered through Ghostscript in two sittings on consecutive days despite printed dates spanning about eight months. The lab's real accreditation, checked against A2LA's own scope document, covers food microbiology, preservatives, and trace elements, not the HPLC purity testing the retatrutide 10mg certificate reports. Has anyone who ordered from Regentide received a certificate addressed to Regentide from the start, rather than one bearing another company's name underneath?
What the record holds
NO FIRM COMMITMENT
“Regentide ships all orders using UPS 2Day Air as our standard service”
UPS Next Day Air offered as a paid upgrade when eligible; no flat rate, dispatch cutoff, or vendor processing-day commitment published on the Shipping page.
Read from this supplier's own pages on 2026-08-25. This publication has never placed an order with any supplier. This row records what is written and measures nothing about what actually happens after an order.
$169.99
Compound retatrutide 10mg
Listed as Retatrutide 10mg, under its own name and also identified on-page as LY3437943, at /product/retatrutide10mg/
Price as recorded $169.99, shown as marked down from $199.99, read from both the product page and the store API on 2026-08-25
Read on 2026-08-25. One reading on one day, and prices are not tracked over time here.
This supplier was not part of the Trustpilot reading of 2026-08-25, which covered 59 of the 126 suppliers on file. That is a fact about this publication's coverage, stated rather than left to be read either way.
6 claims from this publication's own dossier on this supplier were read again against the live site on 2026-08-25: 0 held, 6 corrected before publication.
A corrected claim is an error of ours that the re-read caught before it reached a page. This line tracks this publication's own accuracy. It says nothing about the supplier.
Dated entries
4 observations on file, recorded 2026-08-25. Newest first, appended and never rewritten.
On certificates, and this is a materially different picture from the shopper walk of 2026-08-24, which read only the Retatrutide 30mg page and reported no document anywhere on the site. The bare domain https://regentide.net/ was directly reachable today with the mandated fetch (HTTP 200), unlike the 403 the walk recorded, so every page below was read in full rather than through a workaround. The Retatrutide 30mg page (https://regentide.net/product/retatrutide-30mg/) carries an in-page section labelled COA and Batch (each product page's one WooCommerce tab is Description, so nothing here is a tab in the platform sense) whose content describes what a certificate ought to contain, in a sentence I am paraphrasing because it closes on a word this publication does not print: the document should identify the compound, the sample or lot reference, the analytical method, the date and the reported figure. The same section then makes an affirmative claim with no document behind it, a Reported Purity line stating a level of at least 99 percent HPLC purity as reported on the applicable batch documentation. The 20mg and 5mg pages (/product/retatrutide-20mg/, /product/retatrutide-5mg/) carry no COA and Batch section at all and use different description templates, though the 5mg page's own title element pairs the product name with a 99 percent purity claim and its vial image alt text states a molecular formula, a molecular weight and a 99 percent purity figure while describing a 30mg product on the 5mg page. On none of the three is there a file, a lot number or a laboratory name. The Retatrutide 10mg page, https://regentide.net/product/retatrutide10mg/, is different: it renders a widget labelled DOCUMENT AVAILABLE and ACTIVE CERTIFICATE dated 6/1/2026, giving chromatographic purity, tested quantity, compound, laboratory ID, lot number and a named testing laboratory, with View Full Certificate and Download PDF controls pointing at https://regentide.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Retatrutide-10mg-Report-To-Regentide.pdf. I downloaded that PDF with curl and read its text layer with pdftotext rather than opening it in a browser. On its face it is a one-page Certificate of Analysis from Vanguard Laboratory, 2635 Parkmont Ln, Olympia WA 98502, reporting Compound Retatrutide, Quantity 10 mg, Laboratory ID V260521-25 010, Lot Number RT10051926, dated 6/1/2026, chromatographic purity by HPLC-UV/VIS printed as greater than 99.80 percent followed by a plain plus sign and 0.18 percent (an ASCII plus in both the PDF text and the page widget, not a plus-or-minus sign, and the document does not say what the added term denotes), a measured quantity of 11.06 mg, a line reading Report By Dustin Newman, Laboratory Director, and a line reading Approved By Tori Johnson, Operations Manager, with no signature graphic, citing "A2LA Certificate #6377.01.01" for its list of accredited tests, and carrying its own chain-of-custody disclaimer: the laboratory and its staff did not observe or participate in the sample selection process and cannot confirm the authenticity of the sample or its representativeness of the associated lot or batch. But the document's addressee does not survive inspection. In the PDF's own content stream the Report To field reads Triantex (spelled TrianTex on some files), and the string Regentide is the last text object drawn on the page, after the footer; pdftotext in layout mode renders the two names interleaved character by character in the addressee slot, which is the signature of one name stamped over another. Querying the site's media library for every PDF it holds, https://regentide.net/wp-json/wp/v2/media?mime_type=application/pdf, returned exactly 10 files, all in the same Report-To-Regentide naming pattern and all uploaded 2026-08-04: Retatrutide 10mg, Glow 70mg, Tesamorelin 5mg, Tesamorelin 10mg, PT-141 10mg, Semaglutide 30mg, Semaglutide 10mg, Melanotan 2 10mg, BPC-157 5mg and Klow 80mg. I downloaded all ten today and read each locally: every one carries Triantex as the underlying Report To text with Regentide drawn over it, and every one carries document metadata reading Producer GPL Ghostscript 9.55.0, Creator Microsoft Excel 2016, Author Dustin Newman, with creation timestamps clustered in two sittings (one file on 2026-08-04 and nine within eleven minutes early on 2026-08-05) while the dates printed on their faces span 10/16/2025 to 6/12/2026. Against a 49-product catalog read from the store API (https://regentide.net/wp-json/wc/store/products?per_page=100), that is 10 of 49 items with a Vanguard-branded document, and for Retatrutide specifically it is one of the four strengths sold; each of the ten documented products links its own file from its own product page through the same ACTIVE CERTIFICATE widget, all ten checked today. The Klow 80mg report is the same format from the same laboratory and reports a per-component quantity for GHK-Cu, TB-500, BPC-157 and KPV with no lot number (printed as n/a) and no purity figure at all, only quantity. Separately, a page named exactly for this purpose, https://regentide.net/documents/, renders the literal unprocessed shortcode [crv_documents] as visible page text where its content should be, with no link to any of the 10 PDF files; three further pages fail the same way, /crv-portal/ printing [crv_portal], /crv-blacklist/ printing [crv_blacklist_dashboard], and /vendor-dashboard/ printing [crv_vendor_dashboard].
On the laboratory, checked at the source rather than taken from the certificate. Vanguard Laboratory's own site, vanguardlaboratory.com, returned the same kind of automated Just a moment interstitial that blocked realpeptides.co today, so I could not read it directly. Instead I went to the accrediting body the certificate itself points to. A2LA's public customer portal, https://customer.a2la.org/index.cfm?event=directory.detail&labPID=AFB43615-8155-4AF3-82FA-2020F7FFA8D6, returns an active accreditation record for "Olympic Analytical, LLC DBA Vanguard Laboratory," the same street address printed on the certificate, 2635 Parkmont Ln. SW Ste. A, Olympia, WA 98502, a contact named Dustin Lee Newman matching the certificate's named reporter, standard ISO/IEC 17025:2017, accreditation number 6377.01, and an expiration date of 09/30/2027, so the accreditation itself is real, current and independently confirmed today, not merely claimed. I also pulled the accreditation's own scope document from the same A2LA portal (event=directory.getDocument, accreditationPID=629BE2AF-9DDA-4D86-972F-CD13A6010E39) and read its text layer with pdftotext. Its header prints Dustin Newman with phone 360-967-7010, the exact number in the certificate footer; A2LA's directory contact field lists a different number, 360-908-2787, so that divergence sits between A2LA's own two publications, and the certificate matches the official scope document. The three-page scope, issued 12/22/2025, lists what A2LA Certificate 6377.01 actually covers: a Biological section of nine microbiological assays on food and environmental surfaces (aerobic bacteria, E. coli, Listeria, Salmonella, Staphylococcus aureus, yeast and mold, by named AOAC methods), and a Chemical section with exactly three entries, analysis of parabens, phenoxyethanol and organic acid preservatives by in-house method TM1314, trace elements by ICP-MS under EPA 200.8 (Modified), and a residual-solvent panel under TM4222. Nowhere in either section does the scope list chromatographic purity testing, peptide identity testing, or any HPLC-UV/VIS method, which is the method printed on the Retatrutide 10mg certificate itself; a keyword scan of the whole scope for HPLC, peptide, purity, identity, endotoxin, LAL, sterility and USP returns zero hits. One more mismatch: the certificate cites A2LA Certificate #6377.01.01 while the A2LA directory and the scope document itself print 6377.01, a number the extra suffix does not match. So three claims need separating: the laboratory is genuinely A2LA-accredited under ISO/IEC 17025:2017, which is independently verifiable and true; the specific test reported on the Retatrutide certificate does not appear among the tests that accreditation covers, based on the scope document A2LA itself publishes for this exact certificate number; and the certificate's addressee field, per the document forensics in the certificates entry, did not originally carry this vendor's name.
Catalog, prices, payment, shipping and entity, read on 2026-08-25. The store API, https://regentide.net/wp-json/wc/store/products?per_page=100, lists 49 products; the XML product sitemap lists 46 URLs, a small gap I did not resolve. Retatrutide is sold in four strengths, not the three the shopper walk recorded: 5mg $139.99 marked down from $149.99 and out of stock, 10mg $169.99 from $199.99 in stock, 20mg $245.99 from $394.99 in stock, and 30mg $375.99 from $569.99 in stock. On payment, read the same way as for Real Peptides, through the store's own cart endpoint rather than by proceeding through checkout: https://regentide.net/wp-json/wc/store/v1/cart returned payment_methods of ["regentide_cashapp_qr","regentide_zelle","regentide_wise_ach_manual"], confirming the shopper walk's Cash App, Zelle and Wise ACH finding directly from the store's own configuration rather than by reaching the payment screen. On shipping, the Shipping page (https://regentide.net/shipping/) states "Regentide ships all orders using UPS 2Day Air as our standard service" with UPS Next Day Air offered as a paid upgrade when eligible at checkout; no flat rate is published on this page. On the refund policy (https://regentide.net/refund_policy/, dated January 2025): damaged or incorrect orders must be reported within 48 hours of delivery, and for a shipment the carrier marks delivered but the customer cannot locate, the policy states plainly "delivery confirmation from the carrier is considered proof of delivery," with no stated reshipment or refund commitment for that case beyond "we will assist where possible." The Terms and Conditions (https://regentide.net/terms-and-conditions/, also dated January 2025) states the age floor as "Users must be at least eighteen years old," confirming the shopper walk's reading directly from the terms page. Entity and contact, consistent across every page footer I loaded: REGENTIDE (trademark notice reads "Copyright 2026 - REGENTIDE (TM) is a protected trademark"), address 8880 Rio San Diego Dr. 8th Fl, San Diego, CA 92108, phone +1 (314) 228-4304 with hours Monday to Friday 9:30 AM to 5:30 PM EST, and an email address that renders as a Cloudflare-obfuscated placeholder in the page text but decodes from the page's own data-cfemail attribute to mail@regentide.net.
CAUTIONCautions noted. First, and largest: the CRV Verified badge that anchors this site's whole trust presentation is a paid commercial certification, a fact that appears nowhere on regentide.net itself. Reading crvverified.com directly today, its Fee Structure page (https://crvverified.com/fee-structure/) states a one-time Initial Assessment fee of $4,500 plus an ongoing Certification Monitoring fee of $175 per month, both payable by the business seeking the badge, and the same page states plainly "Certification is not guaranteed" and calls the assessment fee non-refundable even for an incomplete or withdrawn review. Nothing on either domain states that Regentide itself paid these fees, so what is on record is the fee schedule and the absence of any fee-relationship disclosure anywhere on regentide.net, not an asserted payment; Regentide's About Us page describes the badge as being "independently listed" and supporting "third-party verification confidence," and a visitor would have to leave the vendor's domain to learn the certification is bought. CRV's own About page (https://crvverified.com/about-us/) carries a section headed "CRV Is Not" whose first item is marked up as "A government or regulatory authority" (the negation lives in the heading), followed by "Not a product approval or endorsement service," "Not a laboratory accreditation body," "Not a guarantee of future business conduct" and "Not a source of medical, legal, or product-use advice." Second, whether CRV is independent of this vendor at all is an open question with structural signals pointing toward common control: Verisign RDAP shows regentide.net registered 2025-09-26 and crvverified.com registered 2025-10-04, eight days apart, both delegating to the identical Cloudflare nameserver pair (dara and kaiser), which Cloudflare assigns per account; Regentide holds registry code CRV-RE-000001, the first entry in CRV's own numbering; and regentide.net's broken pages carry CRV plugin shortcodes including administrative ones, crv_portal, crv_blacklist_dashboard and crv_vendor_dashboard, that a merely certified customer would have no evident use for. These are signals, not proof, and I could not close the question from public records. Third, CRV Verified LLC itself discloses no street address and no phone number on its About, Contact, Fee Structure or Legal Framework Terms pages, only a contact form and an email obtained through Cloudflare's obfuscation; for an operation charging thousands of dollars to certify vendors, its own public accountability trail is thin. Fourth, the ten documents themselves carry the addressee problem recorded in the certificates entry, and it outranks any coverage arithmetic: the underlying Report To text on all ten PDFs is Triantex, with Regentide stamped over it, and all ten were re-rendered through Ghostscript across 2026-08-04 and 2026-08-05 despite printed dates on their faces spanning October 2025 to June 2026. Fifth, coverage of analytical documents is narrow and uneven even within one compound: 10 of 49 catalog products carry a Vanguard-branded report, and for Retatrutide, only the 10mg strength has one while the 5mg, 20mg and 30mg strengths, including the 30mg strength examined in the prior shopper walk, show descriptive text with no file, the 30mg and 5mg pages adding purity claims with no document behind them. Sixth, the site's own Documents page and three other CRV-named pages print raw unrendered shortcodes where their content should be, so there is no site-wide certificate hub and the trust scaffolding is unfinished rather than merely thin; the ten real files are reachable only from their own product pages. Seventh, format is inconsistent between the reports I read in full: the Retatrutide 10mg certificate carries a specific lot number and a purity percentage, while the Klow 80mg certificate from the same laboratory prints its lot number as n/a and reports quantities only, no purity figure at all.
Reader reviews
No reader review of this supplier is published yet. Every review is read and checked against the record before it appears. Add a review.
Open this supplier
Some supplier links here are referral links, marked where they appear, which pay Terminus Research when a reader buys. The same terms are open to every supplier in the ledger, apart from the one exception the referral policy page names, participation changes no score, rank, caution, or coverage decision, and a link is not an endorsement.