Real Peptides
realpeptides.co
Email me when this record changes
Following this record emails you when it gains a dated entry or its published claims are re-read, and nothing about any other supplier. No topic below is ticked: tick one only if you also want it in the same email.
Compiled automatically from the dated observations in this vendor's record. How we evaluate.
Never merged into one number. Some supplier links here are referral links, marked where they appear, which pay Terminus Research when a reader buys. The same terms are open to every supplier in the ledger, apart from the one exception the referral policy page names, participation changes no score, rank, caution, or coverage decision, and a link is not an endorsement.
Real Peptides sells retatrutide under the name Trinity-X, and its Freedom Diagnostics certificates verify field for field against documents pulled directly from the lab's own domain: the 20mg vial reads 99.77 percent purity by HPLC with UV detection coupled with mass spectrometry, matching the vendor's posted image exactly. The front page also credits a second lab, Kovera, with full-panel testing, but that name appears nowhere in the site's own certificate index and ties to no specific document, and the storefront's own front end returns a bot-check wall that the store's own API and the WordPress.com image proxy both get around. Has anyone gotten a certificate that actually names Kovera as the tester, rather than Freedom Diagnostics alone?
What the record holds
STATED WINDOW IN DAYS
“processing of 1 to 2 business days”
From the Shipping Policy page (wp page id 9914); no flat rate stated on that policy page itself. Optional third-party Route Shipping Protection add-on offered at checkout for lost/stolen/damaged claims.
Read from this supplier's own pages on 2026-08-25. This publication has never placed an order with any supplier. This row records what is written and measures nothing about what actually happens after an order.
$130.00
Compound retatrutide 10mg
Listed as Trinity-X (GLP3R), 10mg Dose variant. The word retatrutide is absent from the product title and the URL slug /products/trinity-x/, but it does appear in the variation SKU, 9091398631679-retatrutide, which is only visible in the store's product API and not on the rendered page
Price as recorded $130.00 for the 10mg vial, one of four Dose variants (10, 12, 20, 24mg) priced $130.00 to $300.00. The 12mg ($150.00) and 24mg ($300.00) variants were out of stock on this date; 10mg and 20mg ($260.00) were in stock
Read on 2026-08-25. One reading on one day, and prices are not tracked over time here.
This supplier was not part of the Trustpilot reading of 2026-08-25, which covered 59 of the 126 suppliers on file. That is a fact about this publication's coverage, stated rather than left to be read either way.
6 claims from this publication's own dossier on this supplier were read again against the live site on 2026-08-25: 0 held, 6 corrected before publication.
A corrected claim is an error of ours that the re-read caught before it reached a page. This line tracks this publication's own accuracy. It says nothing about the supplier.
Dated entries
4 observations on file, recorded 2026-08-25. Newest first, appended and never rewritten.
Front-end fetch note first: the rendered site rejects the mandated fetch at the origin. https://realpeptides.co/, https://www.realpeptides.co/, https://www.realpeptides.co/products/trinity-x/ and every wp-content/uploads media URL I tried directly returned HTTP 403 with a Kinsta-edge "Just a moment..." interstitial (header ki-edge present, a __cf_bm cookie set) that requires script execution to clear, which curl cannot do and which I did not attempt to defeat. Two routes around the wall carry everything below. The site's own WooCommerce Store REST API is not behind it: https://www.realpeptides.co/wp-json/wc/store/products (68 products, HTTP 200), https://www.realpeptides.co/wp-json/wc/store/products/419 (the Trinity-X record) and https://www.realpeptides.co/wp-json/wp/v2/pages all answer plain curl, as does https://www.realpeptides.co/robots.txt. And the certificate images themselves, unreachable at the origin, open at full resolution through the WordPress.com image proxy, https://i0.wp.com/www.realpeptides.co/wp-content/uploads/..., under the same mandated curl call: the Purity-and-Net and Endotoxin files for the 10mg strength returned HTTP 200 at 319786 and 330598 bytes today. On certificates: the COA index at /coas/ is an Elementor page reachable in full through wp-json/wp/v2/pages/80157. It groups certificate image galleries under 54 headings (53 product names plus the page title) against a 68-product catalog. Matching the 53 headings one-to-one against the 68 catalog names, exactly 15 catalog items have no heading that matches them even loosely: Cerebrolysin, MK-677, P21, Pinealon, GLOW Stack, Orforglipron Capsules, NAD+ Liquid Spray 1000mg, Copper Peptide Rejuvenation Serum, SHB (Endure), HHB (Radiance), LC 526 (Lipo-MIC), LIPO-C, SLU-PP-332 Capsules (SLOOP), Dihexa Capsules and Semax Amidate; and five of the matches hold only under a different product name (BPC-157 Tablets against BPC-157 Capsules, Tesofensine Tablets against Tesofensine Capsules, and Nasal Spray headings against the catalog's Liquid Spray items for MOTS-c, Selank and Semax), so the 53 of 68 coverage figure depends on accepting those renames. The Trinity-X (Reta) section carries five image files: Purity-and-Net-2603040162-Trinity-X-10mg and Endotoxin-2603040163-Trinity-X-10mg for the 10mg strength, and one single-page certificate image apiece for the 12mg, 20mg and 24mg strengths (filenames Trinity-X 12MG - 091025, Trinity-X 20MG - 102925, Trinity-X 24MG - 091025), so endotoxin testing on the /coas/ evidence exists for the 10mg strength only. Read off the images through the proxy today: the 10mg purity certificate is issued by Freedom Diagnostics, Accession Number 2603040162, Client Real Peptides, Search Code Real2603040162, received 03/04/2026, reported 03/5/2026, Product Trinity-X 10mg, Net Peptide Content 11.66 mg, Identity GLP RT, purity 99.852 percent under a banner stating all chemical analysis was performed by HPLC with UV detection coupled with mass spectrometry, signed Alex Johnson, Principal Chemist; the matching endotoxin certificate, Accession Number 2603040163, runs two replicates against USP <85> and USP <161>, both marked Pass. The laboratory's own hosted copies confirm the other strengths field for field (route in the lab entry): Retatrutide 12mg, 13.89 mg net, 99.659 percent by the same HPLC method, received 9/10/2025; Retatrutide 20mg, 22.08 mg net, 99.77 percent, received 10/29/2025, Stephen Schmidt, Principal Chemist; Retatrutide 24mg, 27.46 mg net, 99.972 percent. The one field genuinely missing is a lot number, printed N/A on every certificate I read. The WordPress media API records for the two 10mg attachments, https://www.realpeptides.co/wp-json/wp/v2/media/59700 and /59699, carry no human-authored caption, no alt text and no populated EXIF image_meta fields, though the description field on each holds auto-generated attachment markup (1261 and 1216 characters), so those records are boilerplate rather than empty. The shopper walk of 2026-08-24 read these images through a browser and reported purity, net weight and endotoxin documents visible; today's proxy read reproduces that under the mandated fetch method and adds the exact figures.
On laboratory attribution, now resolved in two layers. First, a scope correction to the earlier text search: it covered the 68 product descriptions plus the Terms of Service, the Refund/Return/Chargeback policy, the Shipping policy and the Contact page, and within that set the finding stands. 46 of 68 product descriptions contain the word laboratory or HPLC; a representative line, from the BPC-157 10mg description, reads "Each 10 mg vial is produced under ISO-certified conditions, verified 99 percent or greater purity by HPLC, screened for endotoxin (less than 0.1 EU/mg), and shipped with a Certificate of Analysis for your protocols," and none of those pages names an actual testing laboratory; I searched them for Janoshik, Freedom Diagnostics, Kovera, SideChain, Accumark and Testides and none of the six appears in that set. But the front page does name two: https://www.realpeptides.co/wp-json/wp/v2/pages/6 (slug home, published, modified 2026-08-07) carries the line "Independent COA labs: Freedom Diagnostics & Kovera" and a sentence attributing full-panel third-party testing for purity, heavy metals, endotoxins and sterility to Freedom Diagnostics and Kovera, reachable through the same wp-json route as everything else, so the earlier generalization to the whole site was wrong. Second, the first of the two labs verifies at its own source. freedomdiagnosticstesting.com is live, names Freedom Diagnostics at 133 Holiday Ct Suite 106, Franklin, TN 37067, and runs a public certificate lookup keyed on the Search Code printed on the vendor's certificates (the first characters of the client name plus the accession number). The lookup's public document index, a Cloudflare worker at coa-list.nameless-credit-789e.workers.dev, held 58,641 entries when I pulled it today, including all five Trinity-X codes (Real2603040162, Real2603040163, Real2509100004, Real2509100001, REAL2510290034) among 106 entries carrying the Real prefix, and the certificate PDFs serve from the lab's own subdomain, coas.freedomdiagnosticstesting.com. I pulled several and compared them locally: the 20mg document matches the vendor's image field for field (Retatrutide 20mg, 22.08 mg net, purity 99.77 percent by HPLC with UV detection coupled with mass spectrometry, received 10/29/2025, reported 11/1/2025, Stephen Schmidt), and the lab's own paperwork names the compound Retatrutide even though the storefront never prints that word in a product title. So lab identity and document provenance are VERIFIED for Freedom Diagnostics. Kovera is thinner: the name appears on the vendor's front page and nowhere in the /coas/ certificate index content (zero occurrences), and koveralabs.com is a script-rendered application whose plain-fetch HTML carries the title Kovera Labs, Compound Testing and COA Verification, and whose application bundle describes a compound testing operation in Buffalo Grove, Illinois offering HPLC and LC-MS purity testing; nothing on the vendor's site ties any specific certificate to Kovera. Accreditation stays UNVERIFIED for both parties in the strict sense: no ISO 17025 claim appears on the vendor site or the lab site, and Freedom's lookup page claims only compliance with ISO 9001 quality management principles and Good Laboratory Practice principles. One count worth keeping: the lab's home page states 42,378 certificates while the index its own lookup reads listed 58,641 today. "ISO-certified conditions" in the product descriptions still describes a manufacturing environment, not a testing laboratory's accreditation.
Catalog, prices, payment and shipping read from the store's own API on 2026-08-25. The catalog holds 68 products from https://www.realpeptides.co/wp-json/wc/store/products?per_page=100, priced from $12.00 to $300.00, organized into categories including GLP Peptides, Hollywood Stack, Mitochondrial & Metabolic Pathway Research and Popular Peptides. Trinity-X (GLP3R) variant prices and stock, from the variations array inside the parent record at /wp-json/wc/store/products/419, each id resolved individually at /wp-json/wc/store/products/{id} (the /wp-json/wc/store/products/419/variations path itself answers HTTP 404, so the parent record is the source): 10mg $130.00 in stock (SKU RP-RETA10V), 12mg $150.00 out of stock (RP-RETA12V), 20mg $260.00 in stock (RP-RETA20V), 24mg $300.00 out of stock (RP-RETA24V). The parent record's own sku field reads 9091398631679-retatrutide; that string belongs to the parent product, not to any variation, and the compound name is not confined to the API either: the parent record's image gallery carries filenames such as Retatrutide_12_RIGHT_ANGLE.png and Retatrutide_24_STRAIGHT.png, the 12mg, 20mg and 24mg certificate images print Retatrutide in their product field, and the site publishes city landing pages titled with the word (the slug retatrutide-for-sale-charlotte confirmed published today). On payment, which the buyer walk of 2026-08-24 left unverified because checkout sat behind mandatory account registration: the store's own cart endpoint, https://www.realpeptides.co/wp-json/wc/store/v1/cart, returns a payment_methods array without needing an account or a purchase, and on 2026-08-25 it read ["linkmoney","tagada","cryptopay"]. I identified two of the three by fetching their public homepages. tagadapay.com redirects to tagada.io, whose own description reads "The ecommerce operating system for checkout, payments, and messaging. Smart payment routing, one-click upsells, subscription billing, and revenue orchestration, all unified. The best alternative to CheckoutChamp, Funnelish and sticky.io," which is a checkout and payment-routing platform aimed at direct-response ecommerce rather than a single card processor. cryptopay.me redirects to a /business/ page describing itself as "Accept and Send Crypto Payments as a Merchant," letting a merchant hold fiat while accepting Bitcoin and other cryptocurrency. The third gateway id, linkmoney, stays unattributed. The guessable domain linkmoney.app redirects to a sign-in screen titled "Sign In - LinkMoney (Beta)" whose page bundle reads as a personal-finance application with nothing about merchant checkout, so that domain is very likely not the gateway at all; a merchant payments company does trade under the name at a different domain, link.money, titled "Link Money | Open Banking Payments" and selling pay-by-bank, but nothing on the vendor site ties the gateway id to either domain, so this is a plausible, unconfirmed candidate rather than an identification. None of the three registered gateway ids is a conventional named card processor such as Stripe or Authorize.net, though Tagada's own description of routing card payments across multiple downstream processors means a card could still be the instrument a shopper uses. On shipping, /wp-json/wp/v2/pages/9914 (Shipping Policy) states processing of 1 to 2 business days and describes an optional third-party add-on, Route Shipping Protection, bought at checkout: "Route is an optional shipping protection add-on offered at checkout. If selected, your order is protected in the event it is lost, stolen, or damaged in transit... Route handles claims directly." No flat shipping rate is stated on this policy page; the buyer walk's cart-stage figures of $12.95 standard and $44.95 expedited were not re-derived here since that requires adding an item to a cart, which is outside a documentation-only pass. On entity: the Contact page (page id 2776) gives only "St. Petersburgh, Florida" and support@realpeptides.co, no street address, though a separate contact-information page (id 5530, modified 2025-11-11) prints the full "Real Peptides 205 25th Ave NE St. Petersburg, FL 33704 United States." The Terms of Service (page id 5529, carrying a June 2025 revision date) gives a fuller identity: "Real Peptides, 205 25th Ave NE, St. Petersburg, FL 33704, USA," governed by Florida law with venue in Pinellas County, and an eligibility clause stating "You must be at least 18 years old." The sitemap behind /wp-json/wp/v2/pages carries 436 total pages; the great majority I sampled are single-city landing pages combining a compound and a place name, for example retatrutide-for-sale-charlotte, buy-mots-c-peptide-houston and bpc-157-for-sale-anchorage, repeated across dozens of United States cities for retatrutide, tirzepatide, BPC-157 and MOTS-c.
CAUTIONCautions noted, each tied to a page I loaded today. First, a street address conflict that is a live self-conflict on the vendor's own current pages, not a cross-source discrepancy: the Terms of Service (id 5529) and the contact-information page (id 5530) give "205 25th Ave NE, St. Petersburg, FL 33704" as the company address, while the wholesale order page (id 104702, slug real-peptides-wholesale-order, published, modified 2026-07-23) prints "150 26th Ave N, Saint Petersburg, FL 33704" in its footer beside wholesale@realpeptides.co, the same second address the shopper walk of 2026-08-24 recorded. Same city and ZIP code, two different street addresses, both published today, one attached to the company and one to a Wholesale Division. Second, the claims-versus-refund window conflict the shopper walk flagged is confirmed by directly reading both policy pages rather than inferring it: the Claims page (id 103710) states "Claims are covered under our Package Protection guarantee for orders placed within the last 45 days," while the Refund/Return/Chargeback policy (id 9909) requires that to qualify for any replacement, a buyer must "contact support within 48 hours of delivery." Third, the lost-package terms disagree across three of the vendor's own pages rather than closing every path: the refund policy replaces or reships at no cost only if "Your package is confirmed lost in transit and Route Shipping Protection was purchased," but the Shipping Policy (id 9914) states "Without Route Protection: contact our support team and we will review within our standard shipping limitations," and the Claims page itself is a vendor-run Package Protection claim form whose trigger options include Lost in transit and whose offered outcomes include a replacement, gated only on the order sitting within the last 45 days, with no Route requirement anywhere on it. The publishable point is the inconsistency across the three pages, not an absence of any path for a buyer without the add-on. Fourth, the chargeback language the shopper walk quoted is present verbatim in the Refund policy I read today: submitting a chargeback on correctly delivered, verified RUO goods is stated to carry the same three named consequences the walk recorded, cancellation of the order, restriction of the account, and loss of future purchasing privileges. Fifth, on the ISO language: multiple product descriptions state a vial is "produced under ISO-certified conditions," which describes the manufacturing environment, while separately claiming the same vial is "verified 99 percent or greater purity by HPLC" with no laboratory named in any product description or policy page for that verification (the two labs the front page names appear in no description), so the ISO reference and the purity claim read as two different assurances that a shopper could easily conflate into one. Sixth, the scale of the location-page program is worth naming on its own: 436 total pages behind a 68-product catalog, the bulk of them city-specific landing pages naming a compound and a place (a pattern also present, at far smaller scale, on other vendors in this corpus), which is a programmatic search-visibility tactic rather than a documentation gap, but it is a fact about the site's footprint that a visitor arriving through search would not necessarily see reflected in the 68-item shop itself. Seventh, an age split inside the site's own pages: the front page (id 6) states "Site access restricted to researchers 21+" while the Terms of Service eligibility clause states "You must be at least 18 years old"; the stricter number sits on the page every visitor lands on and the looser one in the terms.
Reader reviews
No reader review of this supplier is published yet. Every review is read and checked against the record before it appears. Add a review.
Open this supplier
Some supplier links here are referral links, marked where they appear, which pay Terminus Research when a reader buys. The same terms are open to every supplier in the ledger, apart from the one exception the referral policy page names, participation changes no score, rank, caution, or coverage decision, and a link is not an endorsement.